Reported Cases
In re CCT Communications, Inc., 420 B.R. 160 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
2009) (applying the doctrine of judicial estoppel to bar a Chapter
11 debtor from disclaiming its earlier small business debtor election).
Kara Homes, Inc. v. Nat’l City Bank (In re Kara Homes,
Inc.), 363 B.R. 399 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2007) (holding that affiliated
debtors, each the owner of raw land slated for residential development,
were single asset real estate entities within the meaning of Bankruptcy
Code § 101(51B)).
In re Helm, 335 B.R. 528 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2006) (approving
the rejection of an executory contract which granted designated
agent the exclusive right to collect the debtor’s recording
royalties in perpetuity; rejection constituted an exercise of sound
business judgment under Bankruptcy Code § 365).
Union State Bank v. Weiss, 65 A.D.3d 584, 884 N.Y.S.2d
136 (2d Dep’t 2009) (sustaining the legal sufficiency of tort
claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and negligent misrepresentation
against the executrix of an estate which had given lender guarantees
of payment of various construction loans).
Bank of N.Y. v. Vega Technology USA, 18 A.D.3d 678, 794
N.Y.S.2d 922 (2d Dep’t 2005) (reversing trial court’s
denial of lender’s motion for summary judgment in action to
enforce loan guarantee; lender’s restructuring of credit facilities
over guarantor’s objection did not discharge guarantor’s
liability where guarantee explicitly contemplated modification of
the guaranteed debt).
Bank of N.Y. v. Lockwood Venture Housing, 222 A.D.2d 633,
635 N.Y.S.2d 692 (2d Dep’t 1995) (granting plaintiff’s
motion for summary judgment in action to foreclose acquisition and
development loan mortgages on garden apartment complex; parol evidence
rule barred consideration of borrower’s defense that lender
had agreed to become equity participant in project upon its conversion
to condominium ownership).
Costa v. District Nursing Ass’n, 175 A.D.2d 274,
572 N.Y.S.2d 727 (2d Dep’t), lv. denied, 79 N.Y.2d 752, 580
N.Y.S.2d 198 (1991) (purchaser of real property entitled to recover
down payment from seller where survey incorporated in the contract
of sale did not disclose encroachment from adjoining premises).
|